Home | Site Map | Shopping Cart | Customer Service | (888) 287-8258            Login
Business Valuation Law.

BV Sourcebook

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business Valuation Sourcebook for Attorneys
Case law, regulations, analysis and more.  All in one legal desk reference! 
New 2010 Edition - Published July 2010

Order Now for $99 | View Table of Contents

Edited by Bill Sipes, CPA/ABV, PFS, CFF, ASA, CBA, BVA

BVR’s Business Valuation Sourcebook
is the essential go-to reference for attorney’s handling cases that involve business valuation.  This critical desk reference compiles all the critical primary legal research materials you need in one place -- saving you valuable time.   IRS code, regulations and standards—as well as summaries and commentary on landmark BV cases—including Jelke and McCord—are all included in this comprehensive
550+ page reference.

The BV Sourcebook includes:

  • Case law abstracts and analysis from across the BV spectrum
  • An at-a-glance chart of landmark cases by topic for easy reference
  • State-by-state summary of the leading U.S. cases deciding the disposition of goodwill in marital dissolution
  • Business Valuation Standards from the AICPA, ASA, IBA and NACVA – including recent changes
  • Relevant IRS Code, Revenue Rulings and Procedures, and Treasury Regulations
  • Summary of FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements
  • BVR’s Professional Association Directory
  • The Federal and Regional Reporter’s List
  • A Glossary of Business Valuation Terms

Your time is valuable. Don’t waste it mining larger legal information services or the Web for hard-to-find answers to your business valuation questions.  Rely on Business Valuation Resources, LLC and BVLaw™ for all of your business valuation-related research needs.   The BV Sourcebook puts everything you need in one place!

Table of Contents

Introduction

Chapter 1—Internal Revenue Code

  • § 409A. Inclusion in gross income of deferred compensation under nonqualified deferred compensation plans
  • § 1060. Special allocation rules for certain asset acquisitions
  • § 1374. Tax imposed on certain built-in gains
  • § 2031. Defi nition of gross estate
  • § 2032. Alternate valuation
  • § 2036. Transfers with retained life estate
  • § 2044. Certain property for which marital deduction was previously allowed
  • § 2511. Transfers in general
  • § 2512. Valuation of gifts
  • § 2701. Special valuation rules in case of transfers of certain interests in corporations or partnerships
  • § 2702. Special valuation rules in case of transfers of interests in trusts
  • § 2703. Certain rights and restrictions disregarded
  • § 2704. Treatment of certain lapsing rights and restrictions
  • § 6501. Limitations on assessment and collection
  • § 6662. Imposition of accuracy-related penalty on underpayments

Chapter 2—Treasury Regulations

  • Sec. 20.2031-1 Defi nition of gross estate; valuation of property
  • Sec. 20.2031-3 Valuation of interests in businesses
  • Sec. 25.2703-1 Property subject to restrictive arrangements
  • Sec. 25.2703-2 Effective date
  • Sec. 25.2704-1 Lapse of certain rights
  • Sec. 25.2704-2 Transfers subject to applicable restrictions
  • Sec. 25.2704-3 Effective date
  • Sec. 301.6501(c)-1 Exceptions to general period of limitations on assessment and collection

back to top

Chapter 3—Revenue Rulings and Procedures

  • 59-60 Valuing Shares of Capital Stock of Closely Held Corporations for Estate and Gift Tax Purposes
  • 65-192 Applying 59-60 to Income Tax Valuations
  • 65-193 Modifi cation of 59-60 Regarding Tangible and Intangible Assets
  • 68-609 Excess Earnings Method
  • 77-287 Valuation of Restricted Stock
  • 83-120 Closely Held and Preferred Stock
  • 85-75 Penalty for Valuation Overstatement
  • 93-12 Closely Held Interests and Family Transfers
  • 98-34 Compensatory Stock Options
  • Rev. Proc. 2003-51 Allocation of lump sum purchases of a business
  • 2006-96 Guidance Regarding Appraisal Requirements for Noncash Charitable Contributions

Chapter 4—Landmark Cases

  • Index of Cases by Topic 4-A
  • Astleford v. Commissioner
    • Astleford Has it All: Latest Tax Court Case on FLP Discounts, Data, and More
  • Dallas v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Declines to Tax-Affect S Corp In Gift Transfer Case
    • Tax Court Rejects Tax-Affecting of S Corporation
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
    • Comparing the Butler-Pinkerton Model to Traditional Methods Under Four Daubert Criteria
    • ‘Intrinsic Value’ Doesn’t Meet Daubert Criteria
    • Valuation Experts Required To Have Clear Credentials, Experience, and Methods
    • Experienced (but Uncertifi ed) Expert Caught in Deposition
  • Gross v. Commissioner (II)
    • Daubert issue rears its ugly head in Gross case
  • Estate of Jelke v. Comm’r
    • Jelke Overruled: 11th Cir. Approves 100% Discount For Imbedded Capital Gains
    • Divorce Court Analyzes Built-In Capital Gains and Net Asset Value in Divorce
  • Delaware Open MRI Radiology Associates, P.A. v. Kessler, et al
    • Must-read Opinion from Chancery Court on Tax Affecting, DCF Discounts, and More
  • Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael 4-30
    • Federal cases challenge fi nancial experts on basis of Daubert/Kumho tests
    • State courts consider application of Daubert/Kumho tests to appraisal experts
    • Implications of Kumho for Business Appraisal Experts
    • Daubert/Kumho state challenges to appraisal experts
  • Mandelbaum v. Commissioner
    • Minority Share Gifts: Court Finds 30% Discount for Lack of Marketability
    • Tax Court provides list of factors to consider in determining the size of a marketability discount
  • McCord v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
    • 5th Circuit Reverses McCord, Confi rming Original Valuation Of Marketability Discounts
    • McCord Reversed: Fifth Circuit Affi rms Use of Fixed Dollar Gifts of Limited Partnership Interests
    • After McCord: The Future Of FLP Valuations and Discount Determinations
  • In re Med Diversifi ed, Inc.
    • BV on Trial in Bankruptcy? New York Court Excludes Appraisal as ‘Junk Science’
    • Where Perceived Bias Infects Entire Valuation, Expert Excluded as Unreliable under FRE 702(3)
    • NY Bankruptcy Court Confi rms Valuation of Customer Lists, With High Praise for Valuator
  • Estate of Mirowski v. Commissioner
    • Good News on FLP and LLC Planning—Appraisals Have Value!

back to top

Chapter 5—Additional Cases

  • New Cases in 2010 Edition
    • Estate of Litchfield v. Commissioner
    • Gaskill v. Robbins
    • Sieger v. Zak
    • Estate of Jorgensen v. Commissioner
    • Peterka v. Dennis
    • Estate of Miller v. Commissioner
    • Chick-Fil-A v. CFT Development, LLC
    • MDG Internat’l v. Australian Gold, Inc.
    • Fleischmann v. Fleischmann
    • Inzer v. Inzer
    • Keller v. United States
    • In re American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc.
    • Murphy v. U.S.
    • In re TOUSA, Inc.
    • Veritas Software Corp. v. Commissioner
    • In re Marriage of Devries
    • Grelier v. Grelier
    • In re Sunbelt Beverage Corp. Shareholder Litigation.
    • Estate of Black v. Comm’r
    • Lemmen v. Lemmen
    • Amaraneni v. Amaraneni
    • Dickert v. Dickert
    • Mistretta v. Mistretta
    • Mandell v. Mandell
    • Heckerman v. Commissioner
    • Estate of Godley v. Commissioner (II)
  • Estate of Abraham v. Commissioner
    • First Circuit Affirms FLP Case Against Taxpayer
    • Remainder Interest in FLP Units Argument Rejected
  • Patricia M. Adams, et al. v. United States of America
    • Assignee Interest Not Subject to Liquidation Rights
  • Estate of Baird v. Commissioner
    • Hypothetical Partition Discount is Insufficient for Fractionalized, Non-controlling Interests
    • Fully Documented and Supported Appraisal Reports Helped Put IRS on Notice That Its Litigation Position Was Unsupportable
  • Estate of Berg v. Commissioner
    • Estate of Berg v. Commissioner
  • Bergquist v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Rejects Appraisal of Donated Stock for Incorrect Premise of Value
  • Bernier v. Bernier
    • Debate over Tax-Affecting Plays Out in New Divorce Case
  • Estate of Bigelow v. Commissioner
    • FLP Disregarded Where Decedent Retains Insuffi cient Funds
    • Section 2036(a) Applied to Recapture theValue of Real Property Transferred to FLP
  • Estate of Brocato v. Commissioner
    • 11% Blockage Discount Applied in Apartment Valuations
  • Crescent/Mach I Partnership v. Turner
    • Del. Chancery’s Preference For DCF Turns On Credible Projections
  • Estate of Deputy v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Accepts Negative Industry Risk Premium and Unique Combined Discount Matrix
    • Income Approach Used to Value Boat Manufacturer
  • Derby v. Comm’r
    • Tax Court Examines Charitable Deduction
  • Estate of Dunn v. Commissioner (I)
    • Equipment Company Valuation Turns on Asset- and Earnings-based Values
    • Heavy Equipment Rental Company Valued Using Weighted Earnings and Asset Approaches
  • Estate of Weinberg v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Rejects QMDM and Use of Single Comparable
    • Quantitative Marketability Discount Model Determined Unhelpful
  • Estate of Ray A. Ford v. CIR
    • Holding Company’s Valued Using Net Asset Value
  • Richard S. Gesoff v. IIC Industries Inc.
    • Small-Stock and Company Specifi c Risk Premia Considered in Fair Value Analysis
  • Estate of Gimbel v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Determines Methodology, Discounts for Large Block of Public Shares
  • Gow v. Commissioner (II)
    • Fourth Circuit Affi rms Gow v. Commissioner
    • Voting Trust Not a Factor in Determining Fair Market Value
  • Estate of Green v. Commissioner
    • DLOM major issue; Tax Court ‘splits the baby’
    • Fair Market Value of Minority Interest in a Closely Held Bank Determined
  • Gross v. Commissioner
    • IRS and Taxpayer Agree to 35% DLOM— if FLP Transfers Pass ‘Indirect Gift’ Tests
  • Hackl v. Commissioner
    • Seventh Circuit Affi rms Tax Court; Gifts Were of Future Interests
    • Seventh Circuit Affi rms Decision Denying Application of Sec. 2503 Exclusion Where the Restrictions on Transferability Attached to LLC Units Are Severe
  • Hansen v. 75 Ranch Company
    • Montana Dissenter Awarded Double Amount Originally Offered
  • Harmon v. Harmon
    • Buy-sell Agreement One Factor in Value of Medical Practice
    • Value of an Interest in a Medical Practice Is Not Set by the Buy-Sell Provision
  • Estate of Heck v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Rejects Use of Single ‘Similar’ Comparable
    • S Corp. Valued Using DCF Method
  • Highfi elds Capital, Ltd. v. AXA Financial, Inc.
    • Del. Chancery Rejects DCF Analysis in Insurance Co. Appraisal
  • Estate of Hillgren v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Disregards FLP That is Disregarded by Taxpayer
    • Sec. 2036(a) Applied to Look Through an FLP
  • Holman v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Takes Novel Approach to DLOM Holding Period in Holman
  • Huber v. Commissioner
    • ‘Friends and Family’ Gifts of Private Stock Support 50% DLOM
    • ‘Arm’s-Length’ Determined Using Morrissey Test
  • Estate of Hurford v. Comm’r
    • Latest FLP Case Lists ‘Bad Facts’ to Avoid
  • Estate of Jameson v. Commissioner
    • Fifth Circuit Acknowledges Substantial Built-in Tax Liability on Timber Property
  • Janda v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Considers QMDM and Restricted Stock Studies in Determining Discount for Lack of Marketability
    • Quantitative Marketability Discount Model Rejected
  • Kimberlin v. Comm’r.
    • IRS Stumbles on Characterization and Valuation of Stock Warrants
  • Kohler et al. v. Commissioner
    • Kohler: Textbook Valuation of Large Closely-Held Leads to Total Victory for Taxpayer
    • Tax Court Emphasizes Importance of Valuation Credentials and Familiarity with the Subject Company
  • LabelGraphics, Inc. v. Commissioner (II)
    • Ninth Circuit Affi rms Tax Court Reasonable Compensation Ruling
  • Litman v. United States
    • Litman a New Landmark Among Cases Considering Restricted Stock Discounts 5-97
  • Mad Auto Wrecking v. CIR
    • Tax Court Provides List of Factors to Consider in Determining the Appropriate Amount of Owners’ Compensation
  • Martin Ice Cream Company y. CIR
    • Sale of Subsidiary after Split-off Does Not Establish Value of that Subsidiary
  • Estate of Mellinger v. Commissioner
    • Frederick’s of Hollywood Stock Not Aggregated for Valuation; 25% Blockage Discount Applied
    • Aggregation and Blockage Considered
  • Estate of Mitchell v. Commissioner (II)
    • Ninth Circuit Vacates and Remands Tax Court’s Valuation in Mitchell
  • Normandie Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. CIR
    • Hypothetical Investor Test Used to Determine Officers’ Reasonable Compensation
  • Peracchio v. Commissioner
    • Tax Court Displeased With All Experts’ DLOC and DLOM Analyses
    • Limited Partnership Units Valued
  • Estate of Lillie Rosen v. Internal Revenue Service
    • ‘Classic’ FLP Case by Judge Laro Finds No §2036 Estate Tax Exception
  • Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co., LLC v. Management Planning, Inc.
    • Appraisal ≠ Arbitration; a Court May Review Buy-Sell Valuation for Certain Errors
  • Estate of Simplot v. Commissioner (I)
    • Tax Court Accords Superpremium to Small Voting Block; Allows Deduction of 100% of Trapped-in Capital Gains Tax
    • Voting Privileges Valued as a Percentage of the Company’s Total Equity Value
    • Comments on the Reversal of Simplot
  • Stone v. United States
    • Do BV Methods Apply to Determining Discount for Fractional Interest in Art?
  • Strangi v. Commissioner
    • Fifth Circuit Affi rms Tax Court’s Application of § 2036 to FLP Assets
    • Bona Fide Sale Exception to Sec. 2036 Analyzed
  • Temple v. United States
    • Latest Court Looks at DLOM: Assumptions Are Everything
    • Standard Valuation Discounts Considered
  • Estate of Thompson v. Comm’r
    • IRS Burden of Proof Does Not Obviate Errors In Taxpayer Valuation
    • FLPs Disregarded—2036(a)(1) Applied Once Again!
    • Third Circuit Addresses Sec. 2036(a) Exception in FLP Case
  • Estate of True v. Commissioner
    • Buy-sell Agreements are Testamentary Devices
  • Univ. of Pittsburgh v. Townsend
    • Federal Court Clarifi es Rule on Discovery of Draft Valuation Reports
  • Wechsler v. Wechsler
    • Appeals Court Affi rms Dollar-for-Dollar Discount in Divorce

back to top

Chapter 6—Standards

  • AICPA Valuation of a Business, Business Ownership Interest, Security, or Intangible Asset
  • AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: Section 101—Independence TOC-8 BVR’s Business Valuation Sourcebook
  • AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: Section 102—Integrity and Objectivity
  • AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: ET Section 201—General Standards
  • AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: ET Section 202—Compliance with Standards
  • AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: Section 301—Confi dential Client Information
  • AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: Section 302—Contingent Fees
  • AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: Section 501—Arts Discreditable
  • ASA Principles of Appraisal Practice and Code of Ethics
  • ASA Business Valuation Standards
  • IBA Business Appraisal Standards
  • FASB Summary of Statement No. 123 (revised 2004)
  • FASB Summary of Statement No. 141 (revised 2007)
  • FASB Summary of Statement No. 142
  • FASB Summary of Statement No. 144
  • FASB Summary of Statement No. 157
  • FASB Summary of Statement No. 159
  • NACVA Professional Standards

Chapter 7—Appendix of Key Valuation Articles and Other Material

  • 4th Quarter 2008 Economic Outlook Update™
  • Reporting Standards Update: What all BV Analysts Must Know
  • Courtesy of the IRS: 22 Ways to Avoid Appraisal Missteps
  • Summary of FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements
  • Federal and Regional Reporter’s List
  • Goodwill Hunting in Divorce
  • BVR’s Professional Association Directory 2009 Edition

back to top

 

 

 

Business Valuation Resources, LLC | 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1200, Portland, OR 97205
Customer Service
| (503) 291-7963 phone | (503) 291-7955 fax
© Business Valuation Resources, LLC